Identification of High-Risk Subgroups in very elderly ICU patients

October 2017

Ageing

Country of origin: Holland

Current prognostic models for ICU patients have not been specifically developed or validated in the very elderly. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model for ICU patients aged 80 years and older to predict in-hospital mortality using data obtained within 24 hours after ICU admission. Aside from good overall performance, the model should reliably identify specifically subgroups at very high risk of dying.

A total of 6867 consecutive patients aged 80 years and older from 21 Dutch ICUs were studied. Data necessary to calculate the Glasgow Coma Scale, APACHE II, SAPS II, MPMII scores, and ICU and hospital survival were recorded. Data were randomly divided in a developmental (n=4587) and a validation set (n=2289). Using recursive partitioning analysis a classification tree was developed predicting in-hospital mortality. This model was compared with the original SAPS II model and with the SAPS II model after recalibration for Dutch very elderly ICU patients.

Overall performance measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and by the Brier-score was similar for the classification tree, the original SAPS II model and the recalibrated SAPS II model. The tree identified most patients with very high risk of mortality (9.2% of patients had risk > 80% vs. 8.9% for original SAPS II and 5.9% for recalibrated SAPS II). Using a cut-point at risk of 80%, the positive predictive value was 0.88 for the tree, 0.83 for original SAPS II and 0.87 for the recalibrated SAPS II.

Prognostic models with good overall performance may also reliably identify subgroups of very elderly ICU patients with a very high risk of dying before hospital discharge. The classification tree has the advantage of identifying the separate factors contributing to bad outcome and of using few variables. Up to 9.5% of patients were found to have a risk to die > 85%.

The complete article is available as a provisional PDF.

Resources

inPractice® Oncology. December 2018 inPractice® Oncology is the only point-of-care clinical reference designed to meet the unique needs of specialists. Full...
OrthoFlow pocket orthopaedic specialist. December 2018 Welcome to OrthoFlow…the orthopaedic specialist in your pocket! This new way of learning is designed to help you diagnose...
Healthy ageing in the 21st century November 2018 A report, from the University of Birmingham, explores how good ageing in a multi-cultural society is defined. It is looking...
Frail older people: Safe, compassionate care November 2018 A practical guidance document, from NHS England summarizes the evidence of the effects of an integrated pathway of care for...
Incisional Hernia Risk Prediction Instrument October 2018 The Hernia Calculator from the University of Pennsylvania Health System was developed from data spanning a 7-year time...
National Hip Fracture Database September 2018 It is estimated that there are 70,000 hip fractures a year in the UK[1] and this is only set to increase as the population...
Challenges to finding treatments for dementia July 2018 A report by Raj Long, Senior Regulatory Officer at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, sets out what and where hurdles...
Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) Auditory Processing May 2018 Welcome to our application for Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART), a program designed to assess auditory processing...
UA Balance a motor-cognitive, dual-task training regimen May 2018 Problem: Over 20 million older adults in the US experience falling annually. Thus, a leading cause of traumatic injuries...
Specifically for older adults March 2018 A website tailored to the needs of older people is now available to the public. This site is easy to navigate, features...
Search by Keyword