Accuracy of MMSE in general practice

August 2017

General Practitioners

Country of origin: Italy

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) has contributed to detecting cognitive impairment, yet few studies have evaluated its accuracy when used by general practitioners in an actual public-health setting.

Researchers evaluated the accuracy of MMSE scores obtained by GPs by comparing them to scores obtained by Alzheimer's Evaluation Units (UVA).

The study was observational in design and involved 59 voluntary GPs who, after having undergone training, administered the MMSE to patients with symptoms of cognitive disturbances. Individuals who scored ¡Ü 24 (adjusted by age and educational level) were referred to Alzheimer's Evaluation Units (UVA) for diagnosis (including the MMSE). UVAs were unblinded to the MMSE score of the GP. To measure interrater agreement, the weighted Kappa statistic was calculated. To evaluate factors associated with the magnitude of the difference between paired scores, a linear regression model was applied. To quantify the accuracy in discriminating no cognitive impairment from any cognitive impairment and from Alzheimer's disease (AD), the ROC curves (AUC) were calculated.

For the 317 patients, the mean score obtained by GPs was significantly lower. However, overall concordance was good (Kappa = 0.86). Only the diagnosis made by the UVA was associated with the difference between paired scores: the adjusted mean difference was 3.1 for no cognitive impairment and 3.8 for mild cognitive impairment. The AUC of the scores for GPs was 0.80 for discriminating between no impairment and any impairment and 0.89 for distinguishing patients with AD, though the UVA scores discriminated better.

The research concludes that in a public-health setting involving patients with symptoms of cognitive disturbances, the MMSE used by the GPs was sufficiently accurate to detect patients with cognitive impairment, particularly those with dementia.

'The accuracy of the MMSE in detecting cognitive impairment when administered by general practitioners: A prospective observational study' is available online.

Resources

Clinical Pain Advisor June 2018 Clinical Pain Advisor is a free, simple to use, medical app that offers pain medicine healthcare professionals a...
NHS Information Centre Indicator Portal June 2018 One thousand indicators covering a wide range of population health topics have been brought together in the NHS Information...
Setting Standards for Antenatal Care June 2018 NICE has produced a quality standard on antenatal care to help improve the care that women receive during their...
Managing Head Injury June 2018 The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has issued an updated guideline on the early care of...
inPractice® Oncology June 2018 inPractice® Oncology is the only point-of-care clinical reference designed to meet the unique needs of specialists. Full...
AO/OTA Fracture Classification app May 2018 The 2018 AO/OTA Fracture and Dislocation Classification is a streamlined, concise, and clinically relevant tool for coding...
Trauma Nursing May 2018 We offer 10 or more free multiple-choice or flashcard style questions. Additional questions for each specialty are...
xRapid-Malaria: the automated diagnostic test May 2018 A world first in mobile health, xRapid-Malaria allows health workers from all over the world to diagnose malaria quickly,...
UA Balance a motor-cognitive, dual-task training regimen May 2018 Problem: Over 20 million older adults in the US experience falling annually. Thus, a leading cause of traumatic injuries...
NeoCHART resuscitation record May 2018 NeoCHART creates a real-time accurate resuscitation record for babies.
A PDF of events can be emailed, printed, or saved.
Search by Keyword