User Experiences Of The Cochrane Library
Country of origin: Europe
Click for Full Details: www.biomedcentral.comEvidence-based decision making relies on easy access to trustworthy research results. The Cochrane Library is a key source of evidence about the effect of interventions and aims to "promote the accessibility of systematic reviews to anyone wanting to make a decision about health care". Recent research explored how health professionals found, used and experienced The Library, looking at facets of user experience including findability, usability, usefulness, credibility, desirability and value.
Researchers carried out 32 one-hour usability tests on participants from Norway and the UK. Participants both browsed freely and attempted to perform individually tailored tasks while "thinking aloud". Sessions were recorded and viewed in real time by researchers. Transcriptions and videos were reviewed by one researcher and one designer. Findings reported reflect issues receiving a high degree of saturation and that are judged to be critical to the user experience of evidence-based web sites, based on principles for usability heuristics, web guidelines and evidence-based practice.
Participants had much difficulty locating both the site and its contents. Non-native English speakers were at an extra disadvantage when retrieving relevant documents despite high levels of English-language skills. Many participants displayed feelings of ineptitude, alienation and frustration. Some made serious mistakes in correctly distinguishing between different information types, for instance reviews, review protocols, and individual studies. Although most expressed a high regard for the site's credibility, some later displayed a mistrust of the independence of the information. Others were overconfident, thinking everything on The Cochrane Library site shared the same level of quality approval.
The article concludes that paradoxically, The Cochrane Library, established to support easy access to research evidence, has its own problems of accessibility. Health professionals' experiences of this and other evidence-based online resources can be improved by applying existing principles for web usability, prioritising the development of simple search functionality, emitting "researcher" jargon, consistent marking of site ownership, and clear signposting of different document types and different content quality.
The article, published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, is available online.
Click for Full Details: www.biomedcentral.com
The Lancet March 2019
MedCalX March 2019
Read by QxMD Personalized Medical Journal February 2019
MDCalc the best online medical calculator February 2019
Safety Features Of GP Computer Systems January 2019
The CDC Clear Communication Index November 2018
PRIMIS + November 2018
Journal of Medical Internet Research October 2018
Read by QxMD March 2018